Video Business Models

Ad-Supported Streaming and FAST Channels

How free ad-supported streaming TV channels are scheduled, delivered and paid for, who funds them, and how they differ from on-demand services.

On this page
  1. What a FAST channel is
  2. How a channel is assembled
  3. Where the money comes from
  4. Why the model exists
  5. Limits and trade-offs
  6. How FAST relates to other models
  7. Reading claims about FAST

What a FAST channel is

FAST stands for free ad-supported streaming television. A FAST channel looks and behaves much like a traditional television channel: there is a schedule, programs follow one another, and you tune in to whatever is playing rather than picking a title from a menu. The difference is that it arrives over the internet, usually inside an app or a smart TV interface, and it costs the viewer nothing to watch beyond the ads.

This is different from an on-demand service that happens to show ads. On those services you choose a title and it starts. On a linear channel the programming is lined up in advance, which is closer to broadcast television than to a catalog.

How a channel is assembled

A channel is usually built from existing programming. An owner of a film library, a set of older series, a news archive or a niche collection can package that material into a continuous stream. Common themes include a single genre, a single franchise, cooking shows, classic series or news and weather.

Behind the scenes, the channel operator typically prepares a playout schedule, a list that says which video plays when. Ad breaks are inserted at planned points, and the stream is then delivered like other live-style video, using the same ideas as the general streaming pipeline and a content delivery network to reach many viewers at once.

Because the channel repeats and reshuffles existing material, it can often be run with a smaller team than one making fresh productions. That is part of its appeal for owners of older catalogs, which may otherwise earn little.

Where the money comes from

The simple answer is advertisers. Ad breaks are sold to companies that want to reach the audience, and the viewer pays with time and attention rather than a fee. How that revenue gets divided is where things become less simple, because several parties are often involved:

  • The content owner, who provides the programming and expects a share.
  • The channel operator, who may be the same company or a separate one that packages and schedules the material.
  • The platform or app, which provides the place where the audience finds the channel and often controls the viewer relationship.
  • Technology and ad-serving partners, who insert and measure the ads.

Revenue sharing arrangements are negotiated and rarely public. In general terms, a platform that brings the audience may keep part of the ad income, and the rest is split between the people who supplied and operate the channel. Specific percentages vary and should not be assumed.

Ads on these channels are generally sold by one of two routes. Some are sold directly, where a salesperson agrees a campaign with an advertiser. Others are sold programmatically, through the kind of automated process described in the article on ad auctions. Which route dominates differs between channels.

Why the model exists

Several things make free ad-supported channels workable. Smart televisions and streaming devices have made it easy to open an app and watch without signing up. Many viewers are comfortable with television that simply plays, and for some, a lean-back experience is a feature rather than a drawback. Advertisers, for their part, have been looking for places to reach people who no longer watch traditional broadcast television, a trend connected to cord cutting.

For program owners, there is also a practical benefit: a catalog that has little value on a paid service can still earn something when packaged as a channel, particularly if it has a loyal niche audience.

Limits and trade-offs

The model has weaknesses worth knowing about.

Revenue per viewer is typically modest. Income depends on how many ads can be shown and how much advertisers will pay for them. A channel needs steady viewing to be worthwhile, and an audience that is spread across a very large number of channels can be hard to build.

Discovery is difficult. With many channels available, being found depends heavily on where the platform places the channel in its guide. Channel owners often have limited control over this.

The experience can be repetitive. Because programming is repeated, regular viewers may notice reruns or similar ad breaks. Ad load, the amount of advertising per hour, is a balance between income and viewer patience.

Measurement is imperfect. Advertisers want to know who watched, and measurement on connected televisions can be less detailed than on a personal device. Data about households and devices is often limited, and privacy rules differ between regions.

Rights can limit the lineup. Programming may only be available in certain countries or for a set period, a consequence of how licensing and windowing works.

How FAST relates to other models

FAST channels sit alongside subscription services rather than replacing them. A viewer might subscribe to one or two paid services and also use free channels for background viewing or for older programming. Some companies operate both: a paid service for exclusive or newer titles and a free channel lineup that draws on a wider library.

It is also worth separating FAST from on-demand ad tiers. An ad-supported tier of a subscription service still requires an account and a fee. A FAST channel is generally free and often needs no registration, though this can depend on the platform.

Reading claims about FAST

Growth claims about this part of the industry are common, and numbers differ by source and by what is being counted. Viewing hours, channel counts and revenue are measured in different ways, and forecasts are only forecasts. A cautious reader should ask what exactly is being measured and by whom, and treat projections as uncertain.

What is established is the basic structure: free access, linear scheduling, advertising-based revenue and a shared division of income among several companies. How large and lasting the category becomes remains an open question.

The complete guide to video business models

How Streaming Services Make Money
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →